 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Microsoft Word
Version |
 |
 |
adapp.doc |
 |
162 KB Word 2000
file |
 |
1 min @ 28.8
kbps |
 |
 |
 |
Compressed Word
Document |
 |
 |
adapp.exe |
 |
108 KB executable
file |
 |
1 min @ 28.8
kbps |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
Summary
This paper describes a variety of architectural
models for integrating the Active DirectoryTM service with applications to
deliver enhanced functionality and lower total cost of
ownership.
Most companies recognize that installing, using, and
maintaining distributed applications represents a cost
to their bottom line. Most ongoing costs, such as those
associated with daily data backups and installing new
users, are fairly easy to understand and predict. But
other costs are less obvious:
- Client Configuration. As the rate of
business change increases, making sure that client
machines continue to have the right software installed
and are configured properly represents a significant
and growing expense. For example, when a person moves
from one department to another, an administrator needs
to delete some applications and add others - and make
sure that each is configured correctly. Improper
configurations cause problems ranging from service
interruptions to applications that damage corporate
data unintentionally by applying out-of-date business
rules.
- Server Configuration. Most applications
require administrators to assign clients to specific
server-side elements, such as databases and
application components, at the time of client
deployment. Because clients are bound to specific
machines, this kind of static configuration can hurt
service levels. Users must wait for failed machines to
be restarted before they can continue working. And
when server load increases, users can experience
slower response times even if other servers have
excess capacity.
- Information Proliferation. The growing
popularity of distributed applications has led to a
proliferation of directories that contain similar
information about users, machines and other network
resources. E-mail systems have address books, for
example, that contain much of the same information
about users as kept by enterprise resource planning
(ERP) systems. As users are added or updated, all
directories must be kept up-to-date and synchronized
with each other. In addition to problems that occur
when information gets out of synchronization,
identifying sources of synchronization problems - and
restoring consistency to directories - can be very
costly.
- Lack of Inter-Application Awareness.
Perhaps most harmful, most corporate infrastructures
deliver very little synergy between applications,
information kept about users, and infrastructure
elements such as networks. For example, an employee's
applications cannot detect his or her movement between
departments. And doctors in the emergency room may
receive the same quality of network service as clerks
in the billing department; participants in an Internet
video conference see jerky motions and hear distorted
audio because someone else is downloading games.
Unfortunately, the costs represented by lack of
synergy can be the hardest to identify and address.
Whether the cost is tangible or simply an opportunity
cost, each of the areas above contributes in some way to
total cost of ownership (TCO). This paper describes a
variety of architectural models for integrating the
Active DirectoryTM
service with applications to deliver enhanced
functionality and lower total cost of ownership. |